Drawing for PERFECTURF

USPTO serial 78909838

PERFECTURF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTURF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L Wendt

JEFFREY L WENDT THE WENDT FIRM PC34 DRIFTOAK CIRTHE WOODLANDS, TX 77381-6630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biostimulant and fertilizer for golf and sport turfs, trees, shrubs, landscapes, gardens, nursery plants, and greenhouse plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 5, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 12, 2008UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Dec 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 22, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance