Drawing for BARKING MAD

USPTO serial 78920479

BARKING MAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARKING MAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Red wine; Table wines; White wine; Wine; WinesACTIVEDec 14, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 4, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance