USPTO serial 78922170
LABO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LABO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Lee
Jason R. Lee The Trademark Firm PLLC2370 W SR 89ASuite 11-225Sedona, AZ 86336Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | An optical metrology inspection system comprised of a light source, one or more cameras and sensors in communication with computer software and hardware, Anti-reflective lenses, Autocollimators, Beakers, namely, laboratory glassware, Binoculars, Biological microscopes, Biomicroscopes, Body-tubes for microscope, namely, lens-barrels, Body-tubes for telescopes, namely, lens-barrels, Bunsen burners for laboratory use, Calibrated glassware, Cameras, Computer programs for editing images, sound and video, Computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs, Computer software for controlling and managing patient medical information, Computer software for scientific analysis of genetic sequences, Digital cameras; Digital signal processors, Disposable latex gloves for laboratory use, Disposable plastic gloves for laboratory use, Disposable reusable dispenser syringes for laboratory use, Electromagnets; Electron microscopes, Epidiascopes, Eyeglass lenses, Filters for optical devices, Flasks, namely, laboratory glassware, Furnaces for laboratory experiments, Galvanometers, Glass driers for laboratory purposes, Glass graduated scales, Glass tubes for scientific purposes, Glassware for scientific experiments in laboratories, Graduated glassware, Gun scopes, Laboratory apparatus, namely, centrifuges, Laboratory consumables, namely, pipette tips, Laboratory equipment and supplies namely, calipers, Laboratory equipment and supplies, namely, incubators, Laboratory equipment and supplies namely, test tubes, Laboratory equipment and supplies namely, thermometers, Laboratory equipment, namely, pipette racks; Laboratory equipment, namely, plastic, rubber and elastomer closures, seals and stoppers for laboratory bottles, Laboratory equipment, namely, electric bath heaters, Laboratory filters, Laboratory glassware, Laboratory ventilation hoods, Magnifying glasses; Magnifying lenses; Metallurgical microscopes; Microhardness testers; Micrometers, Microscope condensers, Microscopes and parts thereof, Microscopes, namely, stereomicroscopes; Ohmmeters, Operating microscope stands, Ophthalmic lenses, Optical fiber cables, Optical filters, Optical glasses, Optical inspection apparatus for industrial use, Optical lens sights, Optical lenses, Optical or telescopic lens sights, Oscilloscope, Pipettes, namely, laboratory instruments, Polarizing microscopes, Precision instruments for manipulation and positioning of microscopic objects; Prisms for microscopes, Prisms for scientific purposes, Reflectors for microscopes, Refractometers, Rheostats, Rifle scopes, telescopic Riflescopes, Slide boxes, Slide projectors, Software for processing digital images of the anatomy for diagnosis and treatment, Stereoscopes, Telescopes, Telescopic gun sights, Telescopic lens sights, Voltmeters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 15, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 15, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |