Drawing for MADE FRESH DAILY

USPTO serial 78928510

MADE FRESH DAILY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADE FRESH DAILY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer

Robert L. Brewer BASS, BERRY & SIMS PLC315 DEADERICK ST STE 2700NASHVILLE, TN 37238-3001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, printed educational and teaching materials in the fields of reading and writing skills, thinking and learning skills, languages, art, music, social studies, science, mathematics and the humanities; teaching kits comprised of teachers guides, student manuals and plastic transparencies in the fields of reading and writing skills, thinking and learning skills, languages, art, music, social studies, science, mathematics and the humanities; instructional and teaching materials, namely student manuals and teachers guides, picture books, books and magazines, newsletters and bulletins all in the fields of reading and writing skills, thinking and learning skills, languages, art, music, social studies, science, mathematics and the humanitiesACTIVE—
041On-demand and custom publishing of books and magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance