USPTO serial 78928848
THE BODY CLOCK EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BODY CLOCK EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Hill
F. McKay Johnson Hill, Johnson & Schmutz4844 North 300 West, Suite 300TRADEMARKSProvo, UT 84604-5663Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Light therapy devices and apparatus, namely, ocular light therapy apparatus for treating seasonal affective disorders, circadian rhythm adjustments, depression, emotional disorders, sleep disorders, shift-work adjustments, eating disorders and chronic fatigue;ocular light therapy units for simulating natural light variations in intensity which occur during the periods of dawn and dusk | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |