USPTO serial 78936013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas J. Katich
DOUGLAS J KATICH ANSELL ZARO GRIMM & AARON PC1500 LAWRENCE AVECN7807OCEAN TOWNSHIP,, NJ 07712| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Programs in the area of retail and enterprise software for others, namely business process automation and compliance software for time tracking, expenses tracking, cost tracking, billing, change management, issue management, workflow and process management, human resources and workforce management and project management, allowing users to generate reports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |