USPTO serial 78945212
LUNCH MUNCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNCH MUNCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Everett E. Fruehling
EVERETT E FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and scientific apparatus; computer game software; audio cassettes, discs, compact discs, tapes, and digital audio tapes, all featuring prerecorded children's music and activities; decorative magnets; computer mouse pads; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; video tapes featuring prerecorded children's musical and activity programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | games; toys; sporting goods; board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing a board game; question card sets for use in playing a board game; toy modeling compounds; board games that feature toy modeling compounds, sold as a unit; manipulative puzzles; three-dimensional puzzles; card games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; parlor games; plush toys; action figures | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education and entertainment services; entertainment services, namely, interactive online games, interactive online game shows, on-going television programs in the field of game shows and children's shows, television series featuring games and game entertainment shows, and special television game programs; educational services, namely, providing puzzles, trivia questions, brain-teasers and other games and activities that teach physical skills, social skills, learning skills, math skills, reading skills, writing skills and language skills at the preschool, primary and secondary school levels and for adults | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |