Drawing for LADERMIQUE

USPTO serial 78946748

LADERMIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LADERMIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Debra S. Serota

Debra S. Serota FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics; non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated skin creams, non-medicated skin lotions; non-medicated skin cleansers; and non-medicated skin moisturizersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance