Drawing for RECONNECTIVE HEALING

USPTO serial 78952691

RECONNECTIVE HEALING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECONNECTIVE HEALING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Hochman

DAVID HOCHMAN WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO & SCHULMAN LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1550UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Skin care products, namely, cleansing creams, scrubs, masques, toners, conditioners and moisturizers; sunscreen and suntan oils and creams; shaving creams, after shave creams and lotions, body massage creams and oils, bath oils and shower gels, talcum powders, lipsticks and lip balms; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners and grooming preparations in the nature of hair styling preparations; fragrances, namely, perfumes, colognes, and essences in the nature of essential oilsACTIVE—
032Bottled drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 30, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 8, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance