Drawing for GREATERLOUISVILLEWORKS.COM

USPTO serial 78953268

GREATERLOUISVILLEWORKS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREATERLOUISVILLEWORKS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

Amy B. Berge BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP101 S 5TH ST3500 NATIONAL CITY TWRLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3157

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing on-line information in the fields of employment, personnel recruitment, and careers; providing on-line employment placement services and recruitment servicesACTIVEJul 26, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance