USPTO serial 78962753
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Osman
CHARLENE M. KROGH DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 WEWATTA STREET, SUITE 400IP DEPARTMENTDENVER, CO 80202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | THERAPEUTIC DEVICES, NAMELY, APPARATUS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH BATHING BODY PARTS FOR CLEANSING AND HYDROTHERAPY PURPOSES IN THE NATURE OF FOOT BATHS, FOOT BATH TUBS, CUSTOMIZED FOOT BATH TUBS, AND FOOT BATHS FEATURING IONIZATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |