USPTO serial 79004649
RAKEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006065Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with RAKEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berching, DE
Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
DE
Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi;
James M. Bagarazzi; Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveyor machines in the nature of conveyors; sludge collecting machines; mechanical screening/sifting systems consisting of cleaning elements like rakes, scrapes, or brushes fixed to chains which are driven by chain wheels fixed on a drive shaft, said drive shaft being driven by a motor, all sold as a unit; screening/sifting machines; machines for separating solids from liquids; water separator machines; raking systems substantially consisting of raking machines built in a trough of concrete or in a container of steel with an electronic switch and control device for automatic operation of the system; machines for separating solids from sludge; machines for separating solids from surface water [ ; machine parts, namely, climbing screens for separating solids from liquids ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Water purification machines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUBER SE
- Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
- Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
- Other trademarks owned by Hans Huber AG Maschinen- und Anlagenbau
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named RAKEMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |