USPTO serial 79005273
ECOPLUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3158862Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOPLUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-1300 Sandvika, NO
N-1300 Sandvika, NO
NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical apparatus and instruments for use in motor vehicles, namely, electric cables; conduits and cables for handling electrical current; power extension cords; power extension cords for connecting other interconnecting cables, electric relay boxes, electronic battery chargers, engine block heaters for preheating engine coolant, oil sump pan heaters, interior heaters, and windshield defrosters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |