USPTO serial 79005363
GOKAN KÔBÔ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOKAN KÔBÔ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLLEN IP
COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTEN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSINIWESCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand operated tools and implements, namely hand operated choppers, hand operated slicers, scrapers, knives; cutlery, namely, forks and spoons; silverware, namely sterling silverware, sterling silver forks, sterling silver spoons, sterling silver knives; edged weapons, namely knives, pocket knives, razors, scissors, razor blades, penknives | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | House and kitchen utensils, namely pots, pans, serving dishes, hot plates, baking dishes, spatulas, tea caddies and tea services not of precious metal, containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal, boxes of metal for dispensing paper towels; combs, comb cases, toiletry cases, shaving cases, cleaning sponges; unworked or semiworked glass not for building, namely decorative glass not for building, vases, pitchers and tumblers; glassware, porcelain and earthenware, namely glass boxes, candlesticks not of precious metal, cachepots not made of paper, non-electric candelabras not of precious metal, carafes, china ornaments, porcelain ornaments, crystal glassware, porcelain figurines, glass figurines, flasks not of precious metals, glass mosaics not for building purposes, opaline glass, perfume vaporizers sold empty, perfume burners, porcelain door handles, soap dishes, powder compacts not of precious metal sold empty, porcelain statuettes, glass statuettes, works of art, of porcelain, terra-cotta or glass, sugar bowls not of precious metal, cups not of precious metal, tableware not of precious metal, namely table place card holders not of precious metal, napkin rings not of precious metal, candlestick holders not of precious metal, vases not of precious metal, beverage glassware, table plates not of precious metal; fruit cups; napkin holders not of precious metal; soap holders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |