Drawing for SOLIVALVE

USPTO serial 79006022

SOLIVALVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3168831Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 7, 2006
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLIVALVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Sacks and bags included in this class, particularly bags for transporting or storing materials in bulk; raw fibrous textile materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Transportation of goods by rail, truck, airplane, ship; packaging of bulk powders and granulates for transportation; storage of bulk powders and granulates; packaging articles for transportationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 19, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 17, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 12, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance