Drawing for TECAMAX

USPTO serial 79006732

TECAMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093368Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECAMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne E. Naffziger

Anne E. Naffziger Leydig Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. StetsonSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Semi-finished plastic products in the form of films, slabs, blocks and rods [, pipes and profile rods ] for use in manufacturingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 24, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 6, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 18, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 18, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 18, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED—
Apr 18, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Apr 18, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 18, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance