USPTO serial 79006965
BRIGADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Closed circuit television apparatus comprising television cameras and television monitors all for mounting on vehicles; electrical or electronic switches, all for use in stopping or reducing the intake of polluted air into the driver and/or passenger compartments of road vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Parts, electrical parts, and fittings for motor land vehicles, namely, noiseless alarms and backup alarms. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |