Drawing for MIX MAX

USPTO serial 79007112

MIX MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158872Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MIX MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Ian Donahue

Christopher Ian Donahue Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Pastry products, namely, baked cookies and coated snacks in the nature of chocolate covered pastriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 25, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 22, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 18, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance