Drawing for CONDOR

USPTO serial 79007137

CONDOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3550316Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2008
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CONDOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis J. Levy

Louis J. Levy Symbus Law Group PLLC1775 I Street, NW, Suite 1150Washington, DC 20006United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Stockings, socks, panties and underpants, sweaters, pullovers, bathing suits; knitted articles, namely, gloves and scarvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 17, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2015NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 201515AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Jan 27, 2015E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 28, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 21, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 21, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 2, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 2, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2005RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance