Drawing for VISCAP

USPTO serial 79008376

VISCAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373167Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISCAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; clothing, namely, shirts, undergarments, fur coats, suits, trousers, coats, skirts, topcoats, sports jerseys, gloves, neckties, leather belts, socks and stockings; headgear, namely, hats; baseball caps, fur hats; footwear; sports shoes; football shoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jul 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance