Drawing for E2E WIRELESS

USPTO serial 79008588

E2E WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3135974Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 29, 2006
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINERS

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E2E WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical hearing instruments and structural parts sold together as a unitSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 16, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 3, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance