Drawing for NARRATIVITY STRATEGY & STORY

USPTO serial 79010200

NARRATIVITY STRATEGY & STORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NARRATIVITY STRATEGY & STORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035AdvertisingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041EducationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 29, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 11, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance