USPTO serial 79010233
CRH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3148885Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Parts of vehicles, namely, seats, steering columns, electric power window motors, and safety belt guides | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C. Rob. Hammerstein GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by C. Rob. Hammerstein GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson Controls Metals and Mechanisms GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CRH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |