Drawing for KALULUWA

USPTO serial 79011386

KALULUWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3389065Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 26, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALULUWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Oliff

James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, jeans, t-shirts, polo shirts, sweat shirts, sweaters, gloves and socks; belts; footwear, namely, sports shoes, mountaineering boots and sandals; headgear for wear, namely, caps and hats, all of the foregoing to exclude children's clothing.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 15, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 10, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 26, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 19, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 10, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance