Drawing for NOXOL

USPTO serial 79012386

NOXOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302670Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with NOXOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Henscheid

Deborah Henscheid Lorenz & Kopf, LLP7010 E. Cochise Rd.Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for industrial use, namely , for treating polymer scaleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 20, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 6, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 27, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 19, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 14, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 3, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2013PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Feb 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 7, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 11, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 11, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance