USPTO serial 79012983
MICRO STIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177234Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MICRO STIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OSG System Products Corporation
JP
Aichi, 442-0005, JP
Aichi, 442-0005, JP
Aichi, 442-0005, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES26471 RANCHO PARKWAY S. SUITE BLAKE FOREST, CA 92630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal screws, nuts, bolts, tacks, rivets and nails; metal hardware, namely washers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Non-metal nails, wedges, nuts, screws, tacks, bolts, rivets and casters; washers of plastic for use in cellular phones, mobile terminals, personal computers, hard disc drives, compact disc (CD) drives, digital versatile disc (DVD) drives, digital cameras and digital video players ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSG System Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by OSG CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by OSG CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by OSG CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named MICRO STIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |