Drawing for MIRCURY

USPTO serial 79014347

MIRCURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3239956Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2007
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MIRCURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY PREPARATIONS FOR DETECTING GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONS FOR MEDICAL GENE REGULATION PURPOSESACTIVE—
009DETECTION PROBES FOR SCIENTIFIC USE, NAMELY, DETECTION PROBES CONTAINING CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF RNAACTIVE—
042SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 13, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2017PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Apr 22, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 19, 201771AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Apr 19, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 8, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 19, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 19, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance