Drawing for YOUR DREAMS OUR STANDARDS

USPTO serial 79014433

YOUR DREAMS OUR STANDARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187564Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUR DREAMS OUR STANDARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric devices for attracting and killing insects; electric devices for killing insectsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Electric air deodorizers; electric dispensers for air fresheners and deodorizers to be plugged into wall outletsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 21, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 16, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance