Drawing for CLIPSAL THE POWER OF INNOVATION

USPTO serial 79017206

CLIPSAL THE POWER OF INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLIPSAL THE POWER OF INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009switches, namely light switches; and switch gear, namely voltage regulating and boosting devices for electric power lines; cord line switches; electrical connectors and connecting strips, plugs, namely electric plugs, electric sockets, plug adaptors, electrical fuses, electrical fuse links, terminal blocks and junction boxes; electrical power outlets, namely power outlets for floor mounting and portable power outlets; light switch mounting plates, electrical switch brackets, electrical switch blocks and switch boxes; electric appliance cords; electric light dimmers; switchgear, namely fan speed controller; circuit breakers; residual current devices, namely current converters; electric relays; alarm systems, namely fire alarms, burglar alarms; fluorescent starters; non-metallic conduits and fittings therefore for housing electrical cable and wiring, all made of plastic; electronic power control devices; electronic security devices, included in this class, batteries, including dry cell batteries and battery chargers; computer software for controlling home and building environmental, access, and security systems, motion sensitive security lightsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance