USPTO serial 79019511
THERMO EXPRESS WHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3230042Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THERMO EXPRESS WHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wien A-1217, AT
Wien A-1217, AT
Wien, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-electric whisks for whipping cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |