Drawing for RICH

USPTO serial 79020674

RICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302730Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Condensing tower; Plant for producing hydrogen and oxygen through water electrolysis; Gas separation plant; Gas separation equipment, namely, medical nitrogen generator used for generating nitrogen for medicine isolation and mildew-proof; Capsule Filling Machine used for filling capsule with powdery or grainy medicine; Sugar Coating Machine used for sugar coating pill or troche; Gas separation equipment, namely, nitrogen generator used for obtaining nitrogen gas though separating air components by Pressure Swing Adsorption; Air separation device, namely, filer used for removing impurities, namely, oil, water, and dust from air; Gas separation equipment, namely, oxygen generator used for obtaining oxygen gas for industry production or medical treatment or health protection by separating air components, nitrogen generator used for obtaining nitrogen gas for industry production by separating air components; Gas separation equipment, namely, gas extracted equipment used for extracting rare gases, namely, argon, neon, helium, krypton, xenon for industrial production, transportation and storage through separating gases by cooling method; Gas separation equipment, namely, carbon dioxide generator used for extracting carbon dioxide from carbon dioxide enriched air source for freshness keeping or anti-corrosion in industrial production by cooling methodSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 9, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 9, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 9, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance