Drawing for VERVE

USPTO serial 79022045

VERVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228149Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Eastley

Sherri L. Eastley Pirkey Barber PLLC600 Congress Avenue Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010ACOUSTIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, HEARING AIDS AND PARTS THEREOF FOR THE HEARING IMPAIREDSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 25, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 15, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 15, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 5, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance