USPTO serial 79023109
BIOBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3253945Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BIOBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH RYDE NSW, AU
AU
NORTH RYDE NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin M. Zoltick
Martin M. Zoltick Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC901 New York Avenue, NWSuite 900 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | MICROORGANISMS FOR USE IN MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD TESTING LABORATORIES, NAMELY, WATER SOLUBLE FREEZE DRIED PELLETS CONTAINING A PRECISE NUMBER OF MICROORGANISMS FOR USE BY MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD TESTING LABORATORIES AS REFERENCE STANDARDS FOR TESTING PROCEDURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |