Drawing for FLUID SPLASH

USPTO serial 79023350

FLUID SPLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213708Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUID SPLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE B. SEYLER

JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS; MAKE-UP FOR FACE AND BODY; FOUNDATION BLUSH, FACE POWDERS, EYE SHADOW, MASCARA, EYE LINERS, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS; NAIL POLISH; BEAUTY MASKS; SOAPS; HAIR LOTIONS; PERFUME AND FRAGRANCES FOR PERSONAL USE; SKIN AND FACE CLEANSERS AND MOISTURIZERS; CREAMS, GELS AND LOTIONS FOR THE SKIN AND FACE; MAKE-UP BRUSHESSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 22, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 5, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance