USPTO serial 79024221
QUADSKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3382056Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with QUADSKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Ainsworth
Brian E. Ainsworth Price Heneveld LLP695 KENMOOR SE, PO BOX 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Amphibious vehicles [ ; vehicle safety seats for children; fitted vehicle covers; loose covers for amphibious vehicles; seat covers for vehicles; air bags being safety devices for vehicles, air pumps for vehicles, anti-theft alarms for vehicles, sun blinds for vehicles, tires, luggage nets for vehicles, vehicle anti-skid chains, headrests for vehicle seats, wheels for vehicles, vehicle roll bars, tonneau covers, biminis being soft tops for cars, removable hard roofs for cars and fabric roofs for cars, all being accessories for vehicles; winches being parts of land vehicles; windscreen wipers, hoods for vehicle engines, horns for vehicles, doors for vehicles, direction signals for vehicles, anti-dazzle devices for vehicles not including lamp fittings, rearview mirrors for vehicles, bumpers for vehicles, bodies for vehicles, chassis for vehicles, windscreens for vehicles, steering wheels for vehicles, seats for vehicles, running boards for vehicles, windows for vehicles, torsion bars for vehicles, hoods for vehicles, security harness for vehicle seats; anti-theft alarms for vehicles; children's car safety seats ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, swimwear, beachwear, shorts, trousers, sweatshirts, t-shirts; sleeveless vest jackets and waistcoats; ski wear, wetsuits, wetsuits for waterskiing; body warmers being wind resistant jackets; gilets being sleeveless quilted jackets; jackets; fleece jackets; underwear; ties; gloves; socks; footwear including sandals, sports shoes, training shoes, slippers, and deck shoes; headgear, namely, hats, caps, baseball caps; belts; reflective jackets; waterproof clothing, namely, anoraks and coats; waterproof jackets and trousers; windcheaters; pullovers; scarves; sun visors; arm bands, bandanas, sarongs, sweat bands, detachable hoods; parts for the above goods ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ Toy model hobby kits; model vehicles; radio controlled toy vehicles; kits of parts sold complete for constructing toy models; bath toys; model vehicles made of foam; inflatable model vehicles; scale model toys and vehicles; toy vehicles, parts and fittings therefor; stand alone electronic game machines, not for use with television sets; self contained computer games equipment, none being for use with television sets, namely, hand-held computer games consoles; bags adapted to carry sports implements; sports bags adapted or shaped to contain specific sports apparatus; waterski bags, wakeboard bags, surfboard bags; scuba flippers; beach balls; flying discs being toys ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gibbs Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Gibbs Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Gibbs Technologies Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named QUADSKI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |