Drawing for MEMOLINK

USPTO serial 79024846

MEMOLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3376162Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MEMOLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC.2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring apparatuses, namely, electrical or electronic measuring transmitters for measuring a physical, chemical, or analytical parameters, namely, pressure, temperature, mass flow rate, volume flow rate, filling level of a fluid or bulk material in a container, pH, oxidation-reduction-potential, ion concentration, electrical conductivity, turbidity, humidity, content of dissolved gasses in a liquid, especially, content of dissolved oxygen, total organic carbon content in aqueous samples, total nitrogen content in an aqueous samples, specific gravity, viscosity; spectrometers; photometers; potentiometric sensors, namely, pH-electrodes or electrodes for measuring oxidation-reduction-potential; plug connectors with galvanic isolation and inductive coupling; threaded plug connector head; connector plug for an electrode, said plug connector comprising a memory module containing sensor data, calibration data, and electronic signatures; connector cables for galvanically isolated connection between sensors and analyzers or transmitters; data recording apparatuses, namely, memory modules; display devices, namely, LCD-displays, TFT-displays; solar cells; battery modules, namely, battery packs; apparatuses for automated maintenance and automated calibration of pH-electrodes; downloadable or recorded computer software for operation, bringing into service, testing, maintenance, or calibration of the above measuring apparatuses; all of the above goods only in the fields of industrial process measurement instrumentation, industrial process automation, laboratory measurement instrumentation, laboratory automation, manufacturing automation, building automation, environmental measurement instrumentation, medical technology, and traffic engineering, none of the above goods in the fields of office technology and office equipment, respectivelyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 8, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 11, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jan 29, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 19, 2008LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 2, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2006IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2006IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance