USPTO serial 79025607
ALMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340170Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ALMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
VRIEZENVEEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele S. Katz
Michele S. Katz Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2400CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, power-driven pipe cutting machines and other machines, namely pipe notchers and universal pipe notchers for working pipes, tubes and stamp machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand held cutting tools for tiles, clinkers, blocks and plates, namely, so-called stone cutters, block cutters, block splitters, stone splitters, tile cutters, paver cutters, brick cutters, block and slab splitters, manually operated pipecutters and other similar tools, namely, pipe notchers and universal pipe notchers for working pipes, tubes and stamp tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Almi Machinefabriek; Vriezenveen B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named ALMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |