Drawing for PARA'KITO

USPTO serial 79025685

PARA'KITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453898Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARA'KITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dawn Rudenko

Dawn Rudenko DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1633 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, all these products having a repellent effect on mosquitosSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, dermatological products; insecticide products and mosquito-repellants; insect repellents and mosquito repellents in the form of bracelets, ankle rings, chokers, collars, and insecticide tags made of clothSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 6, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 28, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 25, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 24, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 10, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 7, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 7, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 7, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 23, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 24, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 23, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 14, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Nov 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
May 23, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance