Drawing for Serial No. 79026511

USPTO serial 79026511

Serial No. 79026511

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3440847Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 3, 2008
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79026511?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC450 N. Old Woodward AvenueFirst FloorBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Non-electric citrus pressesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 22, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 9, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 17, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 26, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 5, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 11, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance