USPTO serial 79027348
TMAX ANYLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TMAX ANYLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer software for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over; downloadable computer program for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over; downloadable computer software for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over; computer program recorded on a disk for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over; computer program for use in server construction for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over; and server operating software for connecting two or more computers together in such a way that they behave like a single computer, to accomplish parallel processing, load balancing and fail-over | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |