USPTO serial 79028129
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Eastley
Sherri L. Eastley Pirkey Barber PLLC600 Congress Avenue Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | * WIRELESS * RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS * TO BE USED WITH HEARING AIDS * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |