USPTO serial 79028153
I-CONCERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3831966Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-CONCERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Josh A. Partington
Josh A. Partington HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC11730 Plaza America Dr. #600RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [ Telecommunication services, namely, satellite television, video broadcasting and provision of telecommunication access to visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, and comedy performances provided via a video-on-demand service; electronic and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages; electronic transmission of voice, data and images by satellite television, video broadcasting and via a video-on-demand transmission service; telecommunications consultation services, namely, consultation services to cable networks, telephony, DSL and fiber-optic networks, satellite networks and media networks relating to the provision of video on demand services ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, television, and films; mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of content preparation; entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, and comedy performances; entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, and comedy performances; entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of interactive digital programs in the nature of musical performances; provision of non-downloadable visual and audio performances, namely, musical, variety, and comedy performances via a video-on-demand service | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Design and development of databases and multimedia products ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Transmedia Communications SA
- Other trademarks owned by Transmedia Communications SA
- Other trademarks owned by Transmedia Communications SA
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named I-CONCERTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 22, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |