USPTO serial 79028519
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by POLEKS GIDA; SANAYI VE DIS TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pina M. Campagna
Pina M. Campagna Carter, DeLuca, Farrell and Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadSuite 420Melville, NY 11747| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Olive oil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |