Drawing for VON MÜHLENEN DUDINGEN WWW.VONMUHLENEN.CH HARTKÄSE AUS SCHWEIZER ROHMLICH, MINDESTENS 45% FETT I. TR./VOLLFETTSTUFE PASTA DURA, LATTE CRUDO, MIN. 45% DI MATERIAL GRASSA IN M.S. PÂTE DURE AU LAIT CRU, MIN. 45% MATIÈRE GRASSE E.S.  HARDE KAAS, MET RAUWE MELK

USPTO serial 79031419

VON MÜHLENEN DUDINGEN WWW.VONMUHLENEN.CH HARTKÄSE AUS SCHWEIZER ROHMLICH, MINDESTENS 45% FETT I. TR./VOLLFETTSTUFE PASTA DURA, LATTE CRUDO, MIN. 45% DI MATERIAL GRASSA IN M.S. PÂTE DURE AU LAIT CRU, MIN. 45% MATIÈRE GRASSE E.S. HARDE KAAS, MET RAUWE MELK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3531118Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 11, 2008
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VON MÜHLENEN DUDINGEN WWW.VONMUHLENEN.CH HARTKÄSE AUS SCHWEIZER ROHMLICH, MINDESTENS 45% FETT I. TR./VOLLFETTSTUFE PASTA DURA, LATTE CRUDO, MIN. 45% DI MATERIAL GRASSA IN M.S. PÂTE DURE AU LAIT CRU, MIN. 45% MATIÈRE GRASSE E.S. HARDE KAAS, MET RAUWE MELK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Diary products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cheese; all of the aforesaid goods being of Swiss originSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 21, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 12, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 19, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance