USPTO serial 79035780
ESPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3492827Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-20011 Corbetta (Milano), IT
IT
I-20011 Corbetta (Milano), IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and parts of machines for cutting systems and devices for cutting in line and for continuous cutting of flexible materials, namely, machines for cutting paper, cardboard, plastic films, plastics, wrapping films, natural and synthetic fibers, fiberglass and rubber, and component parts for all the aforesaid machines, parts of machines for cutting paper, cardboard, plastic films, plastics, wrapping films, natural and synthetic fibers, fiberglass and rubber, namely, power saw blades, circular tapered knives, circular knife holders, circular knife holders with annular springs, circular bottom knives, circular flat knives and circular multi-bottom knives, metal set screw clamps for holding piece parts on cutting machine tool tables, parts of machines for cutting paper, cardboard, plastic films, plastics, wrapping films, natural and synthetic fibers, fiberglass and rubber, namely, grovered sleeves, contrast sleeves, grooved shafts, contrast shafts, saucer shaped bottom knives, T-shaped bottom knives, circular flat knives on hard metal, linear blades for rotary cutting and linear blades for guillotine cutting, linear blades for shredding machines, circular knives for cardboard machines, parts of machines for cutting paper, cardboard, plastic films, plastics, wrapping films, natural and synthetic fibers, fiberglass and rubber, namely, slotting knives, serrated blades and perforating blades | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |