USPTO serial 79036188
H
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3440924Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with H?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-3115 HH SCHIEDAM, NL
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SOFIA JEONG
SOFIA JEONG TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST. NE,SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cranes; hoisting devices, namely, electric, hydraulic and pneumatic hoists; ground-drilling machinery, namely, well drilling machines; drilling rigs, namely, drills for the mining, oil and gas industry; pipelaying installations in the nature of power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers; replacement parts for these goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction of pipelaying installations, namely, laying and construction of pipelines; installation of ground drilling machinery, namely, drilling rigs; installation of cranes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, development, technical planning and technical advice offered by an engineer, namely, engineering services for building and construction of pipelaying installations and cranes, hoisting devices, namely, electric and pneumatic hoists, ground-drilling machinery, namely, well drilling machines, drilling rigs, namely, drills for the mining industry, pipelaying installations in the nature of power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Itrec B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named H
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |