Drawing for LOACKER

USPTO serial 79038120

LOACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591332Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W DOUGLAS HAHM

RAY THOMAS JR Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street N.W.Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Services for providing food and drink in cafes, canteens, restaurants, fast-food restaurants, self-service restaurants and snack bars; hotels, motels, bar services, cafes, cafeterias, canteens, restaurants, fast-food restaurants, self-service restaurants and snack bars; catering; rental of temporary accommodations, namely, rental of rooms; hotel reservations, namely, making hotel reservations for others; boarding housesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 23, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance