USPTO serial 79038335
HUISMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3708757Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 2009
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HUISMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL-3115 HH Schiedam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL-3115 HH Schiedam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
NL-3115 HH Schiedam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
SCHIEDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cranes; hoisting devices, namely, electric, hydraulic and pneumatic hoists; ground-drilling machinery, namely, well drilling machines, geothermal drilling machines; drilling rigs, namely, drills for the mining, oil and gas industries; pipe laying installations in the nature of power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers; replacement parts for these goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction of pipe laying installations, namely, laying and construction of pipelines, installation of ground drilling machinery, namely, drilling rigs, and installation of cranes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development, technical planning and technical advice offered by an engineer, namely, engineering services for building and construction of pipe laying installations and cranes; hoisting devices, namely, electric and pneumatic hoists; ground-drilling machinery, namely, well drilling machines; drilling rigs, namely, drills for the mining industry; pipe laying installations in the nature of power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Huisman Special Lifting Equipment Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Itrec B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HUISMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |