USPTO serial 79038916
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
E-36645 VALGA (Pontevedra), ES
E-36645 VALGA (Pontevedra), ES
VALGA (Pontevedra), ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for use in sawmills, namely, band saws, circular saws, rip saws, wood cutters, wood trimmers, wood edgers; packing machines; machine tools for wood cutting machines, namely, hydraulic clamps, pneumatic clamps, feeding rollers, headblocks; electric motors for machines; electric food slicers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 26, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |