Drawing for DECEUNINCK FOR BETTER LIVING

USPTO serial 79041009

DECEUNINCK FOR BETTER LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3516617Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DECEUNINCK FOR BETTER LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

James C. Wray James C. Wray1493 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 300McLean, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Non metallic synthetic profiles and semi-finished products for use in further manufacturing, namely, plastic composite materials in the form of profiles and laminates for use in further manufacturingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Nonmetal synthetic profiles for building, namely, profiles for windows and doors, profiles for decorative finishes on windows and doors, profiles for roller shutters, balustrades and fencing systems, plastic floor and windowboards, decking, patio planks, cladding for walls and ceilings and covers for swimming pools comprised of plastic extrusions and laminatesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 16, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 15, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 22, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 15, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 24, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 7, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 7, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 23, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance